Should the tag be renamed to ? I think this would help make it clear that the tag should only be used on questions regarding the macOS

General command line questions not specific to the Terminal app should use , as mentioned in the tag wiki excerpt for :

questions narrowly about alone should use this tag. Please consider using **command-line** for any question not specifically about the native terminal app

However it is still misused heavily. Other macOS app tags have the ‘.app’ extension, however this one doesn't.

Can the tag be renamed?

  • It won't make a difference people don't seem to read tag wikis - they use the terminal so terminal to do the command so the tag must be terminal – Mark Jan 13 '17 at 9:50
  • @Mark That hasn't really been true for [photos] vs [] and other such cases. It's just in this case the tag for Terminal is the style of the former rather than the latter. Even if it doesn't help which I doubt, the tag still doesn't fit with the rest of the tags on the site. – grg Jan 13 '17 at 9:51
  • I could make a synonym for this. Seems reasonable and it's easy to reverse or undo if we decide it didn't help or hurts. – bmike Jan 13 '17 at 13:39
  • Pointing to [terminal] doesn't help though? No-one's trying [] — the problem is people are using [terminal]. My suggestion to show [] would help indicate that's not what they're after, but with the synonym you set up pointing to [terminal], that's the wrong direction? – grg Jan 14 '17 at 15:38
  • Ok. Then let's wait for more consensus. I don't think having command-line and terminal and is a good change. – bmike Jan 14 '17 at 18:30
  • 4
    Neither do I; I'm suggesting only [command-line] and [], just to be clear. – grg Jan 14 '17 at 18:31
  • Let's clear up this [terminal] confusion. – Andrew Grimm Jan 27 '17 at 0:08

I agree with this proposal. '' makes it clear that it is the app and no the general subject of command line or terminal questions. A synonym defeats this, but renaming the tag should work.

'Command-line' for command line issues, and '' for the program.

  • I agree in theory with this. In practice, we would need a team to start editing all the terminal questions to retag them with command-line. Once that effort is 25% of the way done (say 1 thousand of the 3.7k posts tagged with terminal), we might be OK making the change to the tag summaries? Or we could make and have three tags temporarily. Still process the 3.7 k posts to add only where needed and then merge? – bmike Jan 16 '17 at 19:25
  • 5
    @bmike My initial plan (if this was to go ahead) was to rename [terminal] to [] without any need for retagging initially. The tag is misused at the moment, but renaming the tag to something more appropriate won't cause any additional harm in the cases where it's misused currently (it's wrong at the moment, renaming wouldn't make it any more wrong). Then, as part of cleanup, slowly go through the [] questions and retag to [command-line] as appropriate. What change to tag summaries are you suggesting? I don't think having three tags is the way to go, even temporarily? – grg Jan 16 '17 at 19:37
  • @bmike All things considered I am in favour of this proposal. However, I do feel that a cleanup should happen as soon as possible, otherwise we risk creating a bad user experience for some users. FWIW I'd be happy to be a part of any team to edit/retag the questions. – Monomeeth Jan 23 '17 at 3:14
  • 1
    @bmike I'm just wondering whatever happened with this? If nothing, how do we know when a consensus has been reached (one way or the other)? Just asking because I'm happy to help edit/retag questions if necessary. – Monomeeth Mar 6 '17 at 23:03
  • Does SE have functionality for "depreciating" tags? We could let current questions retain the "terminal" tag but bar new questions from using it, so that everyone is forced to use either "command line" or "" going forward. – Wowfunhappy May 25 '17 at 14:05

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .