One Apple.SE we now have at least 13 list/poll style questions. These questions will always be "unanswered" and cause a bit of strife over how to deal with them as sites mature. Should we be allowing list style questions on Apple.SE?


  • Information that can not easily be gleaned from a Google search can be easily put together in a list (eg. Great shortcuts)
  • Tend to create a lot of views and bring a lot of attention than most other questions. (eg. Mac OS X Terminal Tips on Super User)
  • Very beginner friendly

A good example of a list doing well is the recent question Can I open the menu with the keyboard was answered quickly because of an answer put in the Mac OS X Keyboard Shortcuts question.


  • Seen as "Noise" - detract from more serious questions and are often updated keeping them on the front page
  • Value decreases significantly the more answers are provided
  • Often are time restricted (become stale quickly) - how much is it that bad questions are just rephrased as polls instead?

Possible Cons

  • Doesn't scale in terms of usage (few people will read the 2nd page)

A good example of a good list gone bad is the Mac OS X Terminal Tips & Tricks question on Super User. While quite useful once it got past one page it become increasingly useless as the level of noise in the question exceeded the signal (caused by spam, duplicates, new users, duplicates) and it was being constantly bumped to the front page.

Background reading

Current list of list/poll style questions

Note: At present list questions are allowed as nothing has been decided on this (we've had a total ~4 people weigh in on this). Old list questions that have become unwieldy (read: not curated anymore for a long period of time) will be closed. The current list questions are in great shape! Thanks to everyone involved.

  • Made question CW so you can edit the perceived pros/cons as necessary.
    – Chealion
    Commented Sep 9, 2010 at 0:35
  • 2
    While my initial feeling was that they would provide users (even veteran ones like me) with new and interesting applications, the vast amount that have sprung up make me feel that they will have to be reigned in a bit.
    – Josh K
    Commented Sep 9, 2010 at 13:19
  • @Josh K: Any opinion on how much - or just simply they should be?
    – Chealion
    Commented Sep 10, 2010 at 17:03
  • 1
    I don't know. Some of them feel very redundant, with great games, quick look plugins, etc.
    – Josh K
    Commented Sep 10, 2010 at 21:12

3 Answers 3


Right, my basic opinion is this:

Polls are fine, as long as they are on-topic, clearly formulated and a couple of simple rules are in place.

Those simple rules would be something like:

  • One item (application, plugin, whatever) per answer
  • No duplicates
  • Uniform formatting (not as important, but it can make the whole thing more useful)

There's overwhelming evidence (e.g. in the form of hundreds of upvotes) that people often find such poll questions useful, and they obviously help bringing in more users and attention (especially relevant to these beta sites).

"Cons" dissected

That said, let me offer some critical commentary on a couple of the "Cons" you mentioned. (These are things that people, starting from Jeff Atwood, seem to keep repeating even though what I've seen in practice at several SE sites doesn't necessarily support them at all...)

Don't scale

Some truth to it, but not quite so. The fact is that SE software is not optimal for polls with hundreds of answers, but it still works. Nothing crashes; new answers can be added; good stuff still is at the top; bad stuff gets down to the bottom. How exactly does it not scale?

Sure, no-one reads all of the 157 answers to a poll about OS X programs at one sitting. So what? It can still very useful, for example to a person new to OS X who goes through the first 2-3 pages and find plenty of great ideas of what to install!

"Noise" - detract from more serious questions

This is probably the strongest argument of those four. Big polls keep popping up on the front page with new answers and edits. Still: it is quite easy to ignore questions you don't like (but others like very much) and move on with your life. If a tag such as [poll] is used, those who want can even hide them completely.

Even then polls would affect how newcomers perceive the site, right? Well yes, but not in any untruthful way. Don't worry about it too much. People are generally smart and benevolent enough (which is why Stack Overflow works, by the way).

Often are time restricted (become stale quickly)

Some people love to repeat this, but fortunately it is not true at all. Community wiki polls on SE can stay perfectly dynamic, alive and up-to-date. This can be achieved with some active pruning and a couple of key features in the software platform. These features are:

  • The voting system. Good stuff goes up, bad stuff (including duplicates and other worthless posts) goes down.
  • Ability to add new answers.
  • Ability to edit answers (by any trusted users)
  • Ability to delete answers
    • People who posted duplicates usually did it unwittingly, and can often be persuaded to remove such zero-value-adding posts
    • Not as crucial, but still useful: moderators can prune away downvoted duplicates and other crap from the bottom, if they want to.
  • Ability to sort answers by votes and by date

A couple of use cases, with the Mac application poll as an example.

1) Let's say a new OS X app is released, 2 years after the poll was created. The app is absolutely fantastic. Someone goes on and adds an answer about it. Ok, it now has 0 votes and sits at the bottom. Does it get buried behind all the mediocre stuff? No. (Unless it deserves to.) Many knowledgeable users use the "newest" ordering when returning to look a poll question, and if they see good new stuff, they vote it up. If the new app truly is great, it will reach the first page in a few days or weeks, even if the poll has 6 to 8 pages of answers!

If you don't believe me on that one, I can dig up evidence e.g. from some gigantic Stack Overflow poll; I've seen it happen often enough.

It's sort of sad to see those useful questions (some of the community's most-liked questions, actually!) on Super User locked because that is exactly what kills them and makes them stale (no new answers can be added).

2) Let's say a relatively highly-voted app (e.g. Google Chrome) gets a slew of new features, transforming the key essence of that app (say, Google engineers pushed the limits further and it does your laundry now). This affects people's opinions about the app, and our poll is suddenly all stale and obsolete, right? Well, no. Someone goes and edits the CW answer to mention this key fact. It gets votes from new users and moves higher in the list. Those who don't like the new version of the app can change their former upvote to downvote. (Ok, this Chrome example is suboptimal; maybe I'll come up with a better one later.)

Such adaptation to changed world will always take some time, but in the bigger scheme of things it doesn't matter. Like Wikipedia, these things can mostly be self-healing and self-updating if you just let them (i.e. don't lock them!) and if you do just a little bit of curating every now and then.

Examples of great poll questions

Finally, for reference and as examples, below are links to some good polls.

That last one boasts a new (to me, at least) feature:

protected by Will♦ Jul 16 at 2:54

This question is protected to prevent "thanks!", "me too!", or spam answers by new users. To answer it, you must have more than 10 reputation.

The "protected" status seems like a great compromise. It can help in keeping dupes/spam at bay, but, unlike locking, lets the question stay "alive".

  • As you might notice, this is a pet peeve of mine... :P I just hope people would get over the misguided fixation that this Q&A software doesn't work for poll type questions.
    – Jonik
    Commented Sep 9, 2010 at 0:03
  • 1
    @Jonik: This was exactly what I was hoping for. Someone to give a better view of why the poll is just fine. I still disagree but I can understand the upsides to poll questions.
    – Chealion
    Commented Sep 9, 2010 at 0:32
  • "Community wiki polls on SE can stay perfectly dynamic, alive and up-to-date." The reason I made sure the word 'Often' was at the start of that con point was because the majority of the time it's not the case (especially on non-SO sites).
    – Chealion
    Commented Sep 9, 2010 at 0:41
  • 1
    @Chealion: Sure. I'm not arguing in favour of any polls either; only on-topic, well-pruned ones. (CW happily enables almost anyone to participate in pruning. And sometimes even what's initially a poor question might be turned into a useful one.)
    – Jonik
    Commented Sep 16, 2010 at 18:56
  • 1
    In my view, one remaining problem might be "badge farming" (though I think hardly anyone really does that on purpose). In my opinion it would be great if CW posts wouldn't give you badges at all (excluding posts in non-poll questions that became CW automatically, through popularity). I don't know if such change to the platform has been suggested.
    – Jonik
    Commented Sep 16, 2010 at 19:01
  • @Jonik: The current ones are doing exceptionally well. I still don't like them on principle but I can agree they are working.
    – Chealion
    Commented Sep 16, 2010 at 20:08
  • 1
    I think this answer clarifies it a lot for me. I've waffled back and forth just within the OS X Applications thread. One minute I think the thread is great, like after someone posts something that is useful to me. The next minute I'm annoyed because 4 straight answers are highly localized and totally useless to me. But Jonik is right... I set the answer display to "newest", and I only have to see the last few that were posted. I think I'm going to just start downvoting things that seem totally useless to most people. Like if only 1 out of 10 people will care about it, it gets a downvote. Commented Sep 16, 2010 at 21:29
  • @calavera: Personally I just abstain from upvoting if a poll answer doesn't seem useful to me, and reserve downvotes for duplicates (and spam, offtopic posts, etc). But do use votes as you see best! Thanks for feedback :)
    – Jonik
    Commented Sep 17, 2010 at 12:16
  • 1
    @Jonik: We can add the protect flags when necessary - any moderator is able to do that.
    – Chealion
    Commented Sep 17, 2010 at 18:50
  • @Jonik: well that's what I've been doing up till this point. But in order to keep the thread "active" and "fresh", might as well add my personal opinion into the mix :) however, I've barely done this at all, just apps that I either truly don't like or seem totally useless and are just wasting thread space. Commented Sep 18, 2010 at 0:01
  • Unfortrunately, voting here doesn't really work in the long term. I've just reread answers on this question, and some answers that I've previously upvoted, I'd like to downvote now, simply because my preferences have changed. Unfortunately I cannot do that, because my votes are too old. The end result for that specific question is that it reflects some point in the history, but is not reflecting today choices of people who voted two years ago. Commented Nov 10, 2012 at 16:56

I recommend reading Aaronut's answer to the One 'Item' Policy on Meta.Cooking as he states my position much more eloquently than I ever could. If I were not a moderator (as moderators have a binding vote) I would cast a close vote and leave it to see if enough of the community decided they did not like the question. I'm not a fan of list questions (I'm willing to have the community tell me I'm wrong and suck it up).

The TL;DR two sentence version:

One Item Answers fail miserably because it can't scale past the first page and misuses community wiki only to avoid "rep farming" while ignoring all the other issues with this kind of question like just turning into a massive thread from the forums SE is trying to not be. Also I really should read the whole thing because it's well done.

Gaming has some very good reason why they've all but abolished any type of list questions.

I propose we adopt and slightly modify Gaming's stance on List questions as well.


While I agree that there are several poll questions that are considered useful on every SE-site, the vast majority of the poll questions being asked end up being:

  • poorly maintained
  • consisting of many answers that are basically just a link or a one-liner naming the application (or subject at hand)
  • popularity contests, rather than a measure of usefulness

For a poll question to succeed I think it should:

  • have content that teaches users something they didn't know before,
  • give information that helps them decide whether it's useful to them,
  • be based on your personal experience with the application, not just your opinion,
  • also be voted upon based on the usefulness of the information and not just how much users like the app in the answer.

So unless each answer get's the same amount of effort as other answers get, these questions are likely to fail miserably. While I agree that uniform formatting, with one app per answer without duplicates helps, it doesn't address the quality of the answers.

As mentioned in SO blog post on Good subject, bad subjective, not all questions are created equal, so yes some should be allowed, but most shouldn't because they don't have the general level of quality SE-sites try to advocate.

My advice: try to make it work by putting in some effort, if you deem the question good enough. If it fails, don't be afraid to close and/or delete it, to prevent ghost town questions remain on the site!

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .